pavements into white sand ♥

22 Dec 2010

fuck-yeah-tumblrs-best-posts:

Congratulations, this post has made it onto The Best of Tumblr Blog! Trust me, this is big stuff right here. Found on the blog of googlygooeys:
 and the day starts with…(ahh..TGIF!…zzzz)
Follow | Facebook Like It

fuck-yeah-tumblrs-best-posts:

Congratulations, this post has made it onto The Best of Tumblr Blog! Trust me, this is big stuff right here. Found on the blog of googlygooeys:

 and the day starts with…
(ahh..TGIF!…zzzz)

Follow | Facebook Like It

22 Dec 2010

fuck-yeah-tumblrs-best-posts:

Congratulations, this post has made it onto The Best of Tumblr Blog! Trust me, this is big stuff right here. From the blog of googlygooeys:

Fact of the Day #16: We love blaming others.
Click here for more facts :)

Follow | Facebook Like It | Tweet It

fuck-yeah-tumblrs-best-posts:

Congratulations, this post has made it onto The Best of Tumblr Blog! Trust me, this is big stuff right here. From the blog of googlygooeys:

Fact of the Day #16: We love blaming others.

Click here for more facts :)

Follow | Facebook Like It | Tweet It

22 Dec 2010

22 Dec 2010

igoism:

orangegummi:

-bestdeceptions:

Talk - Action = Shit. AMEN

This is implying, though, that “action” is a part of “talk” that can be taken away. (And you’d be left with the resulting equation: Talk = Shit + Action .. which makes no sense.)
Instead, I think of it as a giant universal set sort of thing, with both talk and action in it. The set just then becomes shitty when the action is removed from the set, and all that’s left is the talk.

How about:
(index of worth)= talkaction
so if action>1, your worth increases exponentially;
if 0<action<1, your worth is less than your talk;
if action = 0, your worth is just 1;
if action<0, your worth keeps decreasing (but it’s asymptotic to 0 so you never are completely worthless; you always have hope because you have intrinsic human worth)
*bow*

igoism:

orangegummi:

-bestdeceptions:

Talk - Action = Shit. AMEN

This is implying, though, that “action” is a part of “talk” that can be taken away. (And you’d be left with the resulting equation: Talk = Shit + Action .. which makes no sense.)

Instead, I think of it as a giant universal set sort of thing, with both talk and action in it. The set just then becomes shitty when the action is removed from the set, and all that’s left is the talk.

How about:

(index of worth)= talkaction

so if action>1, your worth increases exponentially;

if 0<action<1, your worth is less than your talk;

if action = 0, your worth is just 1;

if action<0, your worth keeps decreasing (but it’s asymptotic to 0 so you never are completely worthless; you always have hope because you have intrinsic human worth)

*bow*

22 Dec 2010

i say, totally.

i say, totally.

(Source: googlygooeys)

22 Dec 2010

bohemea:

Mila Kunis - Esquire by Sheryl Nields, February 2010

bohemea:

Mila Kunis - Esquire by Sheryl Nields, February 2010

23 Nov 2010

(Source: bookshelves)

6 Apr 2010

ionakmlacson:

classics:

gkojaz:

thedailywhat:

W4NW4N: “I smell something Burning / Today I bought some Tic Tacs”
I wholeheartedly endorse playing with matches / your food (but only insofar as adorable emoti-faces are involves).
[deviantart.]

ionakmlacson:

classics:

gkojaz:

thedailywhat:

W4NW4N:I smell something Burning / Today I bought some Tic Tacs

I wholeheartedly endorse playing with matches / your food (but only insofar as adorable emoti-faces are involves).

[deviantart.]

26 Feb 2010

(via followandreblog)
&lt;3 &lt;3 &lt;3

(via followandreblog)

<3 <3 <3

26 Feb 2010

(via rawrxja)

(via rawrxja)